Tuesday, 15 March 2016

The Politics of Politics

I was interested in this VICE article which is about how the crowds of new Labour Members don't seem that interested in canvassing and going to local party meetings

Some choice quotes include

"Existing cliques at local party level are also said to be putting new members off."

"Branch members have cosy arrangements. They know all the people who turn up for meeting and they are guaranteed to keep their position year after year. They don't want that upset by newcomers,"
 
I would say this isn't just a Labour party problem. I live in the Hazel Grove constituency which is very welcoming and makes good use of local members but in my own experience and those of some of those I speak to, these are occurrences that a number of us can relate to, across all parties.

Tim Farron has made it a mission for all members to recruit two new members by the end of this month. I think this is a laudable aim, but to what end? I understand that OMOV is not moving as fast with regard to committee elections in the Lib Dems and is now part of the governance review. I just hope that it happens, and soon.

Also, do we keep any record of why members leave, and what we might want to do about that? I do hope so.

3 comments:

  1. Re: OMOV for committee elections. On approving the Federal Reports, conference agreed to the necessary rule change to make the franchise for committee elections the same as that for leader/deputy leader.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes, and I was the FE member responsible for bringing those changes in. The issue that has been left to the Governance Review is whether we have gender quotas.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks - I didn't want to post my source as it was a Facebook group that people may not want shared

    ReplyDelete